Roman Monographs - Fountains · part I · Ancient Fountains

	~ Roman Monographs ~ Fountains · part I · Ancient Fountains PAGE 1

FOREWORD

The monograph Fountains comes as a natural sequel to the previous one about the aqueducts. Actually, this was supposed to be one of the very first sections written for the website. But a comprehensive description of such an extensive topic clashed with the limited amount of disk space and traffic provided by the company that originally hosted Virtual Roma free of charge. For this reason the project took years to be published. And although now it is here, there is a good chance that in time further pages may be added. To compile a full picture catalogue of all the fountains extant in Rome, from the tiniest ones to the largest, would have been a stimulating challenge, but I prefer to describe 'only' the ones worthy of being mentioned.

The monograph Fountains comes as a natural sequel to the previous one about the aqueducts. Actually, this was supposed to be one of the very first sections written for the website. But a comprehensive description of such an extensive topic clashed with the limited amount of disk space and traffic provided by the company that originally hosted Virtual Roma free of charge. For this reason the project took years to be published. And although now it is here, there is a good chance that in time further pages may be added.
To compile a full picture catalogue of all the fountains extant in Rome, from the tiniest ones to the largest, would have been a stimulating challenge, but I prefer to describe 'only' the ones worthy of being mentioned.

The choice was based on several guidelines, such as the artistic value of each fountain, its historical interest, the curious features and anecdotes that concern it and - last, but not the least - the actual opportunity of accessing the fountain, as the reader may wish to visit them on the occasion of a visit to Rome.
For this reason a few minor fountains have been intentionally disregarded.

Also courtyard fountains, typically found in palaces and mansions once belonging to noble families, have been left out, as very often they are not accessible to the general public.

courtyard fountain (1669) in via della Panetteria 15	Some of them are works of little or no interest at all; some others, instead, are creations by renowned artists (such as the one shown on the left, for which Gianlorenzo Bernini is credited). But since they are private properties, regardless of their artistic value, they cannot be fully considered as 'fountains of Rome'. Furthermore, since a policy of this website is not to deal with the Vatican, the few fountains officially located within the boundaries of the tiny country have not been taken into consideration (with the only exception of the two twin ones found in St.Peter's Square): strictly speaking, they are not in Rome (nor in Italy, either!), but most of all they are not freely reachable and enjoyable as the Roman ones, described in these pages.	courtyard fountain (late 1600s) in via della Scrofa 70

Despite the cuts, this is still a 26 page monograph (the largest of this website, so far!), in which about 200 fountains are extensively commented and illustrated with over 500 photographs and drawings.

By moving the mouse cursor over the pictures, the exact location of each fountain appears. The loading of some pages may be slower than others, according to the number of illustrations they contain.
This monograph consists of the following parts (clickable index):


part I ANCIENT FOUNTAINS EARLY ROME - MIDDLE AGES pages 1 · 2	part II SMALL FOUNTAINS 16TH - 20TH CENTURIES pages 1 · 2 · 3 · 4	part III MAIN FOUNTAINS 15TH - 20TH CENTURIES pages 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 18 · 19 · 20 · 21

...even this may happen in Rome's fountains! →

piazza Lauro De Bosis (Foro Italico)
'Under Pressure' advertisement installation
author: Juan Galdeano
June 5 - August 10, 2008

ANCIENT FOUNTAINS

THE ORIGINS

Rome's earliest inhabitants, i.e. a number of tribes scattered over the mythical Seven Hills, drew water directly from the Tiber. They could also use small pits or wells for storing rain water, such as the one shown on the right, found by the area of Forum of Caesar, which dates back as far as the 6th century BC. During the Republican age, the Romans exploited the few underground springs extant in the inhabited areas to build the first fountains. Many of their names, such as Fons Lupercalis, Fons Apollinaris, Fons Pici, Fons Mercurii, and others, are mentioned by literary sources, and in some cases we also know approximately where they were located.	small well (6th century BC)

Rome's earliest inhabitants, i.e. a number of tribes scattered over the mythical Seven Hills, drew water directly from the Tiber. They could also use small pits or wells for storing rain water, such as the one shown on the right, found by the area of Forum of Caesar, which dates back as far as the 6th century BC.
During the Republican age, the Romans exploited the few underground springs extant in the inhabited areas to build the first fountains. Many of their names, such as Fons Lupercalis, Fons Apollinaris, Fons Pici, Fons Mercurii, and others, are mentioned by literary sources, and in some cases we also know approximately where they were located.

via dei Fori Imperiali - area of Caesar's Forum

small well (6th century BC)

Some of them were certainly huge, such as the Piscina Publica, i.e. the "public pool" in the southern part of the city, which might have acted as a reservoir rather than as a fountain. By the early imperial age (1st century AD) it had already disappeared, but emperor Octavianus Augustus gave its name to the city's 12th district, so its memory lingered for quite a long time among the local inhabitants.

the site of the Lacus Iuturnae (courtesy of Kalervo Koskimies)	Today very little is left of the fountains of the Republican age, and the few remains still visible barely remind us of their original shape. Only the legends they gave birth to have been handed down in full. This is the case of the Lacus Iuturnae, named after goddess Iuturna, patron of workers whose job had a relation with water. The fountain stood in the Roman Forum's area, by the temple sacred to the Dioscuri (Castor and Pollux, the sons of Jupiter and Leda) because, according to tradition, in 499 BC, after having fought on Rome's side in a battle against the Latin League, they stopped here to drink their horses.

the site of the Lacus Iuturnae

(courtesy of Kalervo Koskimies)

Today very little is left of the fountains of the Republican age, and the few remains still visible barely remind us of their original shape. Only the legends they gave birth to have been handed down in full.
This is the case of the Lacus Iuturnae, named after goddess Iuturna, patron of workers whose job had a relation with water. The fountain stood in the Roman Forum's area, by the temple sacred to the Dioscuri (Castor and Pollux, the sons of Jupiter and Leda) because, according to tradition, in 499 BC, after having fought on Rome's side in a battle against the Latin League, they stopped here to drink their horses.

Not much is left of the Lacus Curtius either, a water spring or, according to others, a simple basin for collecting rain water, located in the Forum's area, as well.

The spot where it stands was the last part of a marsh that once stretched over the whole area where the Forum was built. But according to tradition, the spring originated when a thunderbolt cracked the ground, in 445 BC, and consul Gaius Curtius had the area surrounded with a fence. This was a religious practice: the fall of a thunderbolt was considered to presage negative events, therefore in such cases a body of ten religious ministers called bidentales presided the enclosure of the spot, and the burial of a stone as a symbolic representation of the thunderbolt. The sacrifice of a sheep then followed; on this occasion, the animal was called a bidental, and the spot too was named after it.	the site of the Lacus Curtius (courtesy of René Seindal)

The spot where it stands was the last part of a marsh that once stretched over the whole area where the Forum was built. But according to tradition, the spring originated when a thunderbolt cracked the ground, in 445 BC, and consul Gaius Curtius had the area surrounded with a fence. This was a religious practice: the fall of a thunderbolt was considered to presage negative events, therefore in such cases a body of ten religious ministers called bidentales presided the enclosure of the spot, and the burial of a stone as a symbolic representation of the thunderbolt. The sacrifice of a sheep then followed; on this occasion, the animal was called a bidental, and the spot too was named after it.

the site of the Lacus Curtius

(courtesy of René Seindal)

Lacus Curtius: the original relief	A more adventurous legend tells about the Lacus Curtius as the site of a bottomless hole which - the oracle foresaw - could have been closed only by throwing in it what in Rome was most valuable; so in 362 BC the young cavalier Marcus Curtius, fully armoured and on horseback, threw himself into the hole, which turned into a harmless spring. The relief that marks the spot illustrates this version of the story. A third version is about the chief of the Sabines, Metius Curtius, who fell into the hole.

Lacus Curtius: the original relief

A more adventurous legend tells about the Lacus Curtius as the site of a bottomless hole which - the oracle foresaw - could have been closed only by throwing in it what in Rome was most valuable; so in 362 BC the young cavalier Marcus Curtius, fully armoured and on horseback, threw himself into the hole, which turned into a harmless spring. The relief that marks the spot illustrates this version of the story.
A third version is about the chief of the Sabines, Metius Curtius, who fell into the hole.

However, the site now appears only as an irregularly paved quadrangle, marked by the replica of a relief featuring Marcus Curtius on horseback (the original, of Republican age, is kept in the nearby Capitoline Museums).

During the Republican age the number of fountains was still insufficient for covering the population's needs, especially for those who dwelt off the area of the Forum, and many romans kept drawing water from the Tiber.

For this reason it was not allowed to build houses within a certain distance from the river's eastern bank (the western side was mainly inhabited by immigrants and foreign merchants), and the area to be kept free from private properties was marked with stones, a number of which has been found (see picture on the right). The real wealth of water began with the making of the many aqueducts, between the 1st century BC and the 3rd century AD (see Aqueducts part I), a period during which the number of fountains in Rome considerably increased; they no longer drew water from nearby natural springs, but from the main ducts and their numerous secondary branches. public area delimitation stone →

For this reason it was not allowed to build houses within a certain distance from the river's eastern bank (the western side was mainly inhabited by immigrants and foreign merchants), and the area to be kept free from private properties was marked with stones, a number of which has been found (see picture on the right).

The real wealth of water began with the making of the many aqueducts, between the 1st century BC and the 3rd century AD (see Aqueducts part I), a period during which the number of fountains in Rome considerably increased; they no longer drew water from nearby natural springs, but from the main ducts and their numerous secondary branches.

public area delimitation stone →

One of the most famous ones faced the Colosseum, and was known as Meta Sudans (literally "the sweating meta"). It was shaped as a huge cone, resembling the pillars used in circuses, called metae, which marked the ends of the racing track. Its fame was due to the fact that water did not gush out from a nozzle, but filtered from the inside through the porous stone, giving this fountain a peculiar glistening ('sweating') look, an absolute novelty in those times.
The Meta Sudans suffered important damages during the Middle Ages, as it already appears as a ruin in early views of the Colosseum. In 1936, due to its worsened conditions and totraffic reasons, it was definitively removed, and a round commemorative plaque was set in the center of the the spot.

		(↑ top left) the Meta Sudans in an etching of the late 1500s and (top right) in a photograph of the early 1900s; (← left) the present condition of the site

On the opposite side of the Colosseum, the restored remains of a small fountain can be seen in the area of the Ludus Magnus, the main barracks where the gladiators lived and trained.
Emperor Domitian (AD 81-96) had this complex built close enough to the large amphiteatre so that it could be reached from the barracks by means of an underground passage. In the large courtyard of the Ludus Magnus was a small amphiteatre, for recreating the setting of the Colosseum's arena, and four triangular fountains in the corners, only one of which is now seen.

the small fountain in the Ludus Magnus, also
featured in the Forma Urbis Romae (3rd century map)

fountain in the shape of a horn,
1st century (Capitoline Museums)

As the public fountains became more and more numerous, even larger was the number of private ones, although the latter are not the main topic of this monograph. They decorated the lavish villas of the high class, and had the most fancy shapes.

Roman fountains included the so-called nymphaeums, fountains built with a scenographic setting made of niches, small grottoes or even halls, variously decorated with statues, mosaics, fresco paintings and vegetation. Their size could reach that of major public fountains, or even larger. Most of them stood in private grounds, but a few of them were public.	top element from a small fountain of imperial age (Vatican Museums)

An example are the imposing ruins of the nymphaeum of Alexander Severus, located in the gardens of piazza Vittorio Emanuele, now known as 'Mario's Trophies'.

the remains known as 'Mario's Trophies'	It is also dealt with in the Aqueducts section, part III - page 1, as the fountain was the outlet of a secondary branch given off by the Aqua Marcia aqueduct (the latter followed the nearby eastern walls of the city). Among its original decorations, none of which have been left in place, were two marble groups featuring weapons and armour taken from the barbaric populations fought during the roman campaigns, as a trophy. In the late 16th century these groups were moved to the Capitolium square, where they are still now. Later studies found out that, being earlier than the nymphaeum where they stood, Alexander Severus too had probably taken them from some other pre-existing fountain or building. The ruins of the fountain are now a shelter for one among Rome's many colonies of stray cats.

the remains known as 'Mario's Trophies'

It is also dealt with in the Aqueducts section, part III - page 1, as the fountain was the outlet of a secondary branch given off by the Aqua Marcia aqueduct (the latter followed the nearby eastern walls of the city).
Among its original decorations, none of which have been left in place, were two marble groups featuring weapons and armour taken from the barbaric populations fought during the roman campaigns, as a trophy.
In the late 16th century these groups were moved to the Capitolium square, where they are still now. Later studies found out that, being earlier than the nymphaeum where they stood, Alexander Severus too had probably taken them from some other pre-existing fountain or building.
The ruins of the fountain are now a shelter for one among Rome's many colonies of stray cats.

engraving by E. Du Perac, mid 16th century

the two groups removed from the nymphaeum of Alexander Severus, and a 16th century engraving featuring them still in place

the remains known as 'Temple of Medical Minerva'	Nearby is the nymphaeum of the Licinii, built around the 4th century AD. What are now remains originally formed a round dome-shaped hall, whose walls were very likely covered with paintings and precious marbles, while in the center one or more statues gushed water, surrounded by flowers and plants. It stood in the gardens of the Licinii family's villa, which stretched over a wide area, now crossed by the railway lines. It is still known with its popular name, 'Temple of Medical Minerva', after a statue of the goddess unearthed nearby, which probably decorated the aforesaid gardens, and misled the finders about the real purpose of the hall. The nymphaeum is also mentioned in the tour of Aurelian's Walls, part II, page 3, with other pictures of these impressive though rather neglected remains.

the remains known as 'Temple of Medical Minerva'

Nearby is the nymphaeum of the Licinii, built around the 4th century AD.
What are now remains originally formed a round dome-shaped hall, whose walls were very likely covered with paintings and precious marbles, while in the center one or more statues gushed water, surrounded by flowers and plants. It stood in the gardens of the Licinii family's villa, which stretched over a wide area, now crossed by the railway lines. It is still known with its popular name, 'Temple of Medical Minerva', after a statue of the goddess unearthed nearby, which probably decorated the aforesaid gardens, and misled the finders about the real purpose of the hall.
The nymphaeum is also mentioned in the tour of Aurelian's Walls, part II, page 3, with other pictures of these impressive though rather neglected remains.

An interesting and complicated story is that of the statue known as Marforio, a large reclining bearded figure, believed to be the decoration of an ancient fountain in the Roman Forum. In 1588 it was moved from its original location to the Capitolium Hill, probably for turning it into a fountain again, but this never happened. A document of the same year states that the statue bore the inscription MARE IN FORO ("sea in the Forum"), whence its corrupted nickname, and the old theory according to which it represents a sea divinity, although experts now believe it refers to a river, likely the Tiber. The old interpretation explains why its missing right arm was restored by giving it a new one that holds a sea shell.	Marforio might have been part of an ancient Roman fountain

An interesting and complicated story is that of the statue known as Marforio, a large reclining bearded figure, believed to be the decoration of an ancient fountain in the Roman Forum.
In 1588 it was moved from its original location to the Capitolium Hill, probably for turning it into a fountain again, but this never happened. A document of the same year states that the statue bore the inscription MARE IN FORO ("sea in the Forum"), whence its corrupted nickname, and the old theory according to which it represents a sea divinity, although experts now believe it refers to a river, likely the Tiber.
The old interpretation explains why its missing right arm was restored by giving it a new one that holds a sea shell.

Marforio might have been part of an ancient Roman fountain

However, according to some medieval sources, by the fountain once stood a temple in the Forum of Mars, and the spot referred to as Marfori or Marfoli. Which of the two versions can explain the nickname Marforio is still a matter of debate.
The statue still stands on the Capitolium Hill, in the courtyard of Palazzo Nuovo, which belongs to the Capitoline Museums.
Marforio used to be rather popular among the people of Rome, as it belonged to the group of so-called 'talking statues', see Curious and Unusual page 2.

Marforio in its original location (arrow) in a 16th century drawing of the Forum	For centuries the statue had lain in the nearby Roman Forum area, where some maps and drawings prior to its repositioning feature it, not far from the arch of Septimius Severus, among other scattered remains. When pope Sixtus V had it moved to the Capitolium, also its huge round basin was found. The latter, though, was left in the Forum's area, where it was turned into a drinking-trough for cattle and horses, and given a new water outlet in the shape of a grotesque face carved by Giacomo Della Porta, outstanding fountain-maker of the late 16th century. In 1816 also the basin, up to which rubble and trash had partially grown again, was moved to a more noble location, below the statues of the Dioscuri in front of the Quirinal Palace, while the grotesque face was reused for a small fountain by the river bank (the former will be described in part III, the latter in part II).

Marforio in its original location (arrow)
in a 16th century drawing of the Forum

For centuries the statue had lain in the nearby Roman Forum area, where some maps and drawings prior to its repositioning feature it, not far from the arch of Septimius Severus, among other scattered remains. When pope Sixtus V had it moved to the Capitolium, also its huge round basin was found. The latter, though, was left in the Forum's area, where it was turned into a drinking-trough for cattle and horses, and given a new water outlet in the shape of a grotesque face carved by Giacomo Della Porta, outstanding fountain-maker of the late 16th century.
In 1816 also the basin, up to which rubble and trash had partially grown again, was moved to a more noble location, below the statues of the Dioscuri in front of the Quirinal Palace, while the grotesque face was reused for a small fountain by the river bank (the former will be described in part III, the latter in part II).

But to be moved, disassembled, rebuilt, and then moved again, is a fate that many other less ancient fountains too had to endure in time.


PART I · page 2 THE MIDDLE AGES	PART II SMALL FOUNTAINS	PART III MAIN FOUNTAINS